The aim of this course is to introduce the approaches, developments and concepts of intercultural communication with a focus on interpersonal interaction. The course covers themes such as identity and stereotypes, migration and adaptation, and intercultural communication competence from a critical perspective. Students are supported in developing and applying alternative ways of approaching interculturality.
After completing the course, you will be able to
• understand and discuss fundamental issues in intercultural communication such as identification,
othering or processes related to multilingual interaction
• understand culture and intercultural communication from a non-essentialist viewpoint
• identify power inequalities inherent in representations of interculturality
• revise and apply theoretical concepts of intercultural communication to analyse your own
experiences in the social world
• successfully collaborate in a diverse team
• work with and assess your own intercultural competencies.
Theme 1: Introduction and history of the field
Theme 2: Culture and communication
Theme 3: Values and ICC
Theme 4: Language and ICC
Theme 5: Migration and Adaptation
Theme 6: Identity and Stereotypes
Theme 7: ICC Competence
Grading
The final grade is based on both, the video podcast (50% of the grade) and the research report (50% of the
grade). To grade your assignments, we are working with points, and the maximum amount is 60 points
(equalling a 5, “outstanding”):
• 55-60 points = 5 (outstanding)
• 49-54 points = 4 (excellent)
• 43-48 points = 3 (good)
• 37-42 points = 2 (satisfactory)
• 31-36 points = 1 (pass)
• 30 and below = 0 (fail)
60 points comprise of 30 points for the video podcast and 30 points for the written group report.
Grading (video podcast and written group report)
28-30: Excellent and captivating discussion, depth of reflection, reference to the course materials as
well as to additional sources, critical thinking, choices are justified convincingly, good teamwork
25-27: Interesting and convincing discussion, choices are explained, some critical reflection over course
materials, good teamwork
22-24: Sufficient, clear presentation and effort, reference to materials, fair teamwork
19-21: Minor issues with the discussion, argumentation is not convincing, uncritical, or incorrect
discussion about the concepts and theories, some issues, or challenges within the team
16-18: Major issues with the presentation, no reference to course material, ineffective teamwork